Invicta Men's Pro Diver Collection Coin-Edge Automatic Watch Stainless Steel (Model 8928OB)

Salida a tu país: 13-20 de Septiembre del 2026

Para comprar en web necesitás verificación en dos pasos activa. Te la pedimos una sola vez.

• L

  Laxluver1234

  I've done my research - We have a winner!!!!

  This has been my first automatic type watch purchase. I refused to dive head first into purchasing, what could be considered a "higher end" brand as my first automatic. Examples include citizens (eco-drive), Seiko, Movado (I have one non-automatic), Bulova (I have two non-automatic) and so on. I'm pinching pennies as it is with the economy as it is. What does someone do when they want a watch for a price that won't break the bank, looks nice, functions well, and you can see yourself wearing it frequently?I rarely wear my Movado or Bulova's - matter of fact, I put those in a safe years ago. I only wore them with business suites etc. As daily wear watches, I've bought throw aways over the years. Casio digital watch, timex, no brand names and hell, even a smart watch (which I rarely used to it's full purpose)Enter the Invicta Pro Diver**Pros**- Watch Feels Solid - The band feels like good construction and so does the watch- Band is not loud - I can't really describe what I mean by this but some watch band links "cling" togetherwhen you move or the watch moves. Like it's cheap and loose. Not this band. It's solid.- Looks great - The colors on the band, dial, and so on really pop- Keeping good time - It arrived active already - I set the time last night, right to the second, and so far it's right on the money (I used my desktops windows time to nail the seconds down)- Higher end movement - I did a lot of research on the Seiko movement (NH35A) and according to some online sources, this is a 40.00 dollar movement by itself.- Water Resistance - I was looking forward to having a watch I could wear at all times. Even in the shower. Something as trivial as needing to take a watch off to shower and put back on after is annoying. I showered with it and (**important** make sure the crown is screwed down and tight to turn clockwise) I have no issues to report**Cons**- Clasp Quality - The clasp feels solid for the most part. I could foresee it wearing down over time. Kind of why I've decided to rarely, if ever, take off the watch. I'm not too worried about this.- Does not glow in the dark very well - I don't really know much about the science behind luminous but I can tell you that I'm simply not able to tell the time in the dark. It does glow but not bright enough in my opinion.- Invicta Branding - Some may have no issue with having an "Invicta" engraving on the bezel and the Invicta symbol on the second hand. Some may find that tacky. I personally don't really care.**Take Away**I'm happy with my purchase. I paid 74 bucks (I'm including taxes etc. in that price) for an automatic watch that functions well, looks great, is solid built, and will accomplish what I had as an end goal for buying my first automatic watch. Time will tell (pun intended) how well this watch holds up. I'm not a very daily active person. Meaning I work in an office setting. Not much going on that could cause any sort of issue for the watch. I am active during the week and on the weekends going to the gym etc. I plan on wearing the watch throughout all of those activities. I'll definitely be putting the watch through its paces.If you're just getting into the automatic side of watches, in a market saturated by countless brands mimicking other brands, and where a decent name "high end brand" starts at 150.00 (for really bottom barrel automatics) , to better looking name brand watches priced 300.00 to 500.00 , and you're wanting to save a buck, I think you'll be happy buying this watch.It checked most if not all my checkboxes. For the price and movement quality, you simply can't beat it.Ver másVer menos

  33 personas la encontraron útil

• N

  Num47

  23 de junio de 2011

  A Real Gem at the Price

  I've had this watch for about 6 months now, and I have to say that it is well worth the money.The build of the watch is conservative in a way, in that it is only 40mm. The color combination though is what really sets it out there, with a deep blue face set off by the gold and silver accents. An interesting thing to note is that in the light, the blue has kind of a sunburst effect which really adds on to its beauty, and in the shade, it features a more royal blue color. As for the arms, the second hand is impressive as it does seem to glide across the face of the watch, and the minute and hour arms add on to the sharpness of the watch. The lum I never had an issue with. It lasts the better part of the night for me and is descent. Looking at it, it is easy to see the similarities between it and the Rolex Submariner. Don't assume though that that's what you're getting, because it's not. What you are getting though is a beautiful, functional watch and at mere fraction of the cost. If you want to know, I got mine for $95.99. I do recommend though that you get the $4 sizing tool cause if you take it to a jeweler, it'll cost you an easy $15.Now to a problem a lot of people seem to have with the watch: it's power reserve. All my reply is, is what did you expect. This is not a quarts watch, it's automatic, meaning that it has no battery but rather is powered by reserved kinetic energy you can make either by wearing it or winding it or both more preferably. This makes it less accurate in the fact that it is powered on a continuously changing power source. Honestly though, if you plan on wearing it everyday, you won't notice it too much. Mine only loses a little less than two minutes a week. My Seiko 5 I admit does a better job, but simply doesn't have the same heft and looks as this watch. It is a good alternative if you like that and you can look it up on Amazon. Mine was the SNK375K1 and I have a review and hopefully some pictures too on it if you would like to look at it.Another problem I've read on from other customers is that the gold plating on the band wears off too fast. I would have to attest to this though, because as it does wear off eventually, it's kind of expected under certain conditions. I mean I've rubbed part of mine off, but that's on the parts where it is exposed to constant rubbing on a desk most of the day. That though, took me the better part of 4 months to do, and on a daily basis of 8 hours. So these people who complain about it coming off in a week are obviously doing something a bit more than what they are saying.If you have any questions or want any specific pictures taken of the watch, just leave a comment below.
• M

  Matt

  24 de febrero de 2014

  No Better Watch for the Money.

  I received this watch about a week ago, and I want review it with my initial impressions. I also plan to update this review as necessary in the future. First things first, I want to avoid comparing this watch to a Rolex Submariner as much as possible, but for some obvious reasons, that won’t be entirely possible.The Pro Divers look nearly identical to Submariners so that is the primary reason that a Rolex comparison cannot be entirely avoided. But realistically, I doubt that anybody in the world has ever narrowed their purchasing decision down to a choice between a Rolex Submariner and an Invicta Pro Diver. I bought this watch, not instead of a Rolex, but rather because I aspire to a Submariner. My Dad has a Rolex, and let’s be honest, the Rolex Submariner is a far superior watch in every way. Simply put, a Rolex Submariner is 10 times the watch that a Pro Diver is. But, in defense of Invicta, a Submariner is 100 times the price of a Pro Diver. I think that any further comparison of the two watches is kind of pointless.My first impression of the watch is that it is very high quality for the price. The case is stainless steel with a screw-down exhibition back. The band is very sturdy with solid stainless steel links. However, the end links are hollow but I don’t see this as compromising the bracelet very much. The clasp is adequate, but I don’t feel that it is up to the same standard as the rest of the watch, it feels a little cheap by comparison. All in all though, it is a very sturdy watch.The bezel feels to be very good quality. It is 120 clicks but it is a bit stiff. That is not such a bad thing for me as I doubt that I will ever do any serious diving with it.The screw down crown is pretty good and definitely seals the case well. I have showered with this watch and submerged it in a couple feet of water with absolutely no problem. I see no evidence of water inside the case. I doubt that I will shower or swim with the watch too much as I am not sure how the gold plating will hold up to soap or chlorine. On that note, the gold plating seems pretty good but only time will tell how durable it is.When setting the date and time, I will say that the crown feels a bit gritty. But again, for the price I am not really complaining.The crystal is pretty good and the cyclops is OK. Not very dramatic magnification, in fact I could do without the cyclops altogether.The movement is a Seiko NH35A, 24 jewel automatic. I am not very familiar with this particular movement but I have read pretty good reviews. My experience with it so far is that it is extremely accurate. After a few days I have found it to be within 2-4 seconds per day of the atomic clock. The first three or four days I noticed that it was dead on all day while wearing it, but at night when I took it off and placed it on the dresser it would pick up about 4 seconds. Now, after about a week, it remains dead on all day while wearing it and only picks up a second or two at night. I understand that the mainspring needs a little time to “break-in” and I suppose that is what is happening. Even if I had the movement calibrated I doubt that it will get any closer than 2 seconds a day. That kind of accuracy for an automatic movement is pretty good even by high end Swiss standards.After one week my assessment is this: For less than $100 you are not going to find a better watch! It seems durable and utilitarian without sacrificing aesthetics. It is stylish and gets compliments without being loud or ostentatious.I really have only good to say about this watch and this is mainly due to its quality to cost ratio. If this watch cost $1000 this would be a very different review, but at around $100 you will not find a better watch!Update: I have been wearing this watch, on average, about 4 days per week for about four years now and I still only have positive things to say about this watch. It has held up very well both in terms of functionality and appearance.
• H

  HeyRay

  2 de septiembre de 2011

  So Far So Good

  I purchased the Invicta model 8928OB and received it on 8/30. I wasn't too sure about it after taking it out as I was comparing it to another Invicta that I already own that is a Swiss Movement and has a somewhat heavier feel.Anyway, the color on the face looked a bit more purple than I preferred, however, my oldest daughter said it looked blue to her, and my wife and youngest girl said purple. I really didn't want to go through a return process after waiting so long to get this thing. I really was trying to get the 9938 model but Amazon shows it as unavailable.So, finally decided to buy a new watch, and I opted for the cheaper model since it was the closest thing to the 9938OB.I then set the watch and took it to a mall based jeweler, and had it resized to fit my wrist which cost $12.00.After two days this watch has not lost anytime, and I am routinely comparing the time from the 8928OB and my corporate provided phone which is time synched with company time servers. So far, I am pleased with its time keeping capabilities. I was wary as I am accustomed to Swiss level of accuracy for watches.On day two I executed the basic water test. I took a shower with it on to see if it could handle moisture and water flowing over it. So far, no problems. Make sure the crown is screwed on tight. Don't go King Kong on it, but make sure it's screwed on well.One interesting observation that I received from a co-worker is that he asked me if it was a Rolex, which I kindly replied, no. However, it was a good indication that the watch is a looker, and confirms quite a bit of what other owners have been saying. A good looking watch for the price.Remember it is an automatic watch which this is my first. I didn't wear it the day I received it, and as I was going to the mall to get it resized the watch had stopped. My heart dropped a bit as I thought the worst, but remembered it's an automatic watch. I just unscrewed the crown set the date and time and it started again. This time I kind of swung the bag it was in while I carried it to the jeweler to generate some kinetic energy to store in the spring.I am one who rarely takes off his watch, so unless there is something seriously wrong I probably won't ever have to wind the watch.My few critical points about the watch are the band doesn't feel as heavy as I would like, but considering the price I can grant forgiveness on that point, and the color is more purple in my eyes than blue. However, the positive comments I have received are enough to keep me quiet.To sum it all up, a good watch at a good price under $100, even with the resizing, looks good, and is a reasonably accurate timekeeper. So far, so good.
• D

  D. B. Ward

  7 de junio de 2026

  Highly Recommend, Looks Expensive but Very Affordable!

  I LOVE this watch. My wife and kids got this for me for Christmas and I wear it everyday. I haven't had a watch in a long time. I have a very busy lifestyle so I just never gave it much thought since I always have my phone with me for checking time. My family surprised me with it and they did such a great job finding one that fit my style, my skin tone, my taste. I am proud to wear this thing, it's a beauty and I highly recommend it for anyone looking for a watch that looks very expensive but is very affordable. Love the color combination with the deep blue face and the gold/silver combination in the band. It goes with everything having the gold and silver both present.Ver másVer menos

  2 personas la encontraron útil

• D

  Dr. Wyre Moore

  15 de marzo de 2015

  8 yrs, daily wear, still working; for the money, its a lot of watch - pretty

  Latest update: I bit the bullet on my 7 yr old watch, opened the watch back, and nudged the setting to make it faster. It gains a minute or two a day, but I'm good with that. A little bit fast, and never slow. So, Zero stars, to 3 starts to 5 stars. If it quits, I might by another. Yeah, its that good and pretty.What can you say about a watch that remains fairly good looking for 7 yrs at this price point. So, I've upped it to 5 starts. The lume - so-so; and I've scratched the cyclops, so its not all that clear. But Its still pretty, be it the plating is wearing thru. But for the price point - hard to beat this watch for looks/style and longevity.Previously I wrote: Durable I have to say. I wear it 24 hrs a day, rarely take it off, for now 6 yrs. I do have to adjust the time every 2/3 days. It runs slow, and its annoying. Not quite a precision movement. Just the other day, 4/2021, another person compliments me - nice watch. (I say ty,) The gold on the watchband has worn off about 50%, and I'm thinking of trying another - really? Maybe. Did notice the lume: in the dark - useless; the lume was poor, 6 years later, nothing.As I look around to replace it, I'm reminded this is a watch for less than $100. I may by another. Have upgraded the watch to 3 stars. 5/9/2021.Critical Review:Eye Candy, but not a credible precision watch as in loses/gains up to +/- 5 seconds an hour, when the movement is rated -20 to + 40 seconds a day. Do the math, 5 sec x 24 hrs = +/- 120 seconds a day, as in +2 minutes offI raised my rating from one to two stars because it has lasted 6 yrs as a daily wearing watch. Then from 2 to 3 stars as I'm reminded, as I look for a replacement, its under $100 - not bad.Took me 5 tries to find one that kept so so time. Other attempts: (2015)Tried/returned 5 watches: 2 were 30 sec slow/day; 1 was15 sec slow per day (should have kept this one) ; 1 was 2 minutes slow per day. (Invicta implies they are tested to chronograph standards, which is +/- 5 seconds per day. Funny, maybe they are tested to those standards, but they don't meet them. )If you want a collector piece this is pretty. If you actually want a precision watch you don’t have to adjust every two to three days, I'd pass. I decided to live with adjusting it.One brand new watch with poor precision, no biggie; two brand new watches with the same identical poor precision, not good. 5 watches over the last 6 weeks: consistently 15-30 minutes a day slow/fast. And the last one, 2 minutes a day slow. So much for quality control? (refreshed 2017, 2020, 2021)Refreshed 4/2020 to acknowledge despite having to adjust the time every 2 to 3 days, it has lasted as a daily watch, for five years.Refreshed 5/2021to acknowledge it as a daily water resistant wear watch. Swim, work, ski, dive, shower - if you don’t mind resetting the watch every 2-3 days or you’ll find your self late for events (runs slow). I do not baby this watch. The band and water resistance are holding up. I bezel got hard to turn, so I used pb blaster, and it loosened up nicely. Added a video - it’s scratched a bit, but still working. For the price point might ? replace it with a new one - but would have to raise the stars to at least 4 if I do.Ps: I am not a collector, buy something I like, keep it, wear it 24x7, till it wears out. rarely remove from my wrist.